Manufactured Creativity: Production, Performance and Dissemination of K-pop
K-pop represents a unique and distinct Korean system of “manufacturing creativity,” which involves utilizing global music talents. <br /><br />This article documents K-pop a mode of manufactured creativity, explains the term, and examines how K-pop engages in manufacturing creativity. K-pop’s business model is based on talent and represents a blend of U.S. music strategies, which favor consistency and long-term popularity, and Japanese strategies, which favor quick-selling hits. K-pop embodies creativity and longevity. It outsources creativity but also reprocesses those creative ideas internally. Such manufactured creativity is exemplified by SM Entertainment, which has been global since its start. It expanded its business network globally but also emphasized the internal process of finishing songs, which also involves creative skills and talented performers. As a result, global for K-pop is a combination of global and local.
Gil-Sung Park
Korea Journal, 53.4 (2013): 14-33.
<p>Chua, Beng Huat. 2004. “Conceptualizing an East Asian Popular Culture.” <em>Inter- Asia Cultural Studies </em>5.2: 200-221.</p>
<p>Lie, John. 2012. “What Is the K in K-pop? South Korean Popular Music, the Culture Industry, and National Identity.” <em>Korea Observer </em>43.3: 339-363.</p>
<p>Oh, Ingyu. 2009. “Hallyu: The Rise of Transnational Cultural Consumers in China and Japan.” <em>Korea Observer </em>40.3: 425-459.</p>
<p>Oh, Ingyu, and Gil-Sung Park. 2012. “From B2C to B2B: Selling Korean Pop Music in the Age of New Social Media.” <em>Korea Observer </em>43.3: 365-397.</p>
<p>Ryoo, Woongjae. 2009. “Globalization, or the Logic of Cultural Hybridization: The Case of the Korean Wave.” <em>Asian Journal of Communication </em>19.2: 137-151.</p>
What is the K in K-pop? South Korean Popular Music, the Culture Industry, and National Identity
<p>This article focuses on the source of K-pop’s commercial success and the meaning of that success for South Korean society and culture.</p>
<p>It links Korean music with Confucian Korean culture, a link that was affected by an influx of foreign music styles (Japanese enka, genres from the United States) after 1945. Nevertheless, Korea retained a unique musical aesthetic based on the pentatonic scale and exemplified by the singer Cho Yong-pil. Following the 1970s, a U.S. influence with its diatonic scale began to inform Korean music in response to political and cultural oppression following the liberation of South Korea. This period also witnessed increased popularity of television and music, exemplified by Seo Taiji and Boys, who did not “sound Korean” and introduced dance into their performance. The rise of K-pop is related to the growth of the South Korean economy as an export market as well as the development of technology, especially digitized music and video. This is exemplified by Korean agency CEOs like Lee Soo-man of SM Entertainment. K-pop provided alternatives to American performers, Korean performers of the audiences’ parents’ generation, and J-pop, which did not have global aspirations. The K-pop industry operates like a business driven by profits rather than musical considerations. Music is merely a product to be produced and exported. Because K-pop is a product, it does not retain elements of “traditional Korea” but only exists as a brand.</p>
John Lie
<p> <em>Korea Observer</em>, 43.3 (2012): 339-363.</p>